They were using the name "rubygems" to fund-raise for not-"rubygems."

But how is this a conflict? Both are not-for-profit projects with the same goal? How can one even use the term 'competition' in this context? What if the Ruby community embraces a new and better package manager? This is, again, a net win for the Ruby community, and both projects strive for that?

It doesn't really matter if it's a non-profit. How do you think your company would react if you started raising money using their name?

Is Rubygems a company? My mind cannot comprehend why are people conflating not-for-profit open-source projects with for-profit companies...

If Rubygems was a company, they'd have a trademark, they'd have patents, they'd have lawyers to protect the money they were making from their brand and product. But we are speaking about not-for-profit open-source projects, not for for-profit corporations!

Ruby Central is a company that manages rubygems.org and rubygems. The maintainers who were locked out were being paid by Ruby Central while fundraising for their startup creating a competitor.

Doesn't it seem like a bit of a security risk to you?

No. (Disclaimer I got paid to work on rubygems and have been doing this for 18 years)

How about now?

Why in the world would my opinion have changed?