Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You should fully expect all NOAA data products to disappear. If only I had a few petabytes of spare storage.

Why should the government give that out to the paying public, when one of trumps friends could make a buck selling it to you?

The next obvious step is to dismantle NOAA altogether, because that could be provided by the private market.



During his last administration, Trump nominated Barry Myers to head NOAA. Myers lobbied for AccuWeather, attempting to prevent NOAA from publishing data that would compete with AccuWeather. He was also notable for not having a scientific background. (He ultimately withdrew.)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Lee_Myers


Which I think he deserves credit. Hopefully that came from the heart and he knew that was a bad direction to go.


I don’t know if you’ve read Project 2025, but this is the current plan .. to break up NOAA and privatize and paywall weather data (sell to Accuweather)

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-what-pro...


I was probably a bit too quick on the trigger here.

Why actually shut down NOAA? Let NOAA do the heavy lifting of producing the data products - at taxpayers expense, then let Accuweather have an exclusive contract to sell that data - with private profits.

That sounds much better. So they don't necessarily want to shut down all the government departments.


Yet they are paying for it already and now they get to pay again.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: