There's plenty of skepticism of corporate influence in health care. I am skeptical of anything where money is involved.
Cancer is an extreme example here because being 1. Based on hard physical evidence and 2. having a huge liability for misdiagnosis, doctors/hospitals would be in huge trouble if they diagnosed you with cancer and gave you chemo when you did not have it. This serves as a check against pharmaceutical interests.
Mental diagnoses/treatment on the other hand is mostly done in independent offices, private practices, and in prisons/institutions on committed people, and it carries very little risk if misdiagnosed. With adhd its even worse, because its often a diagnosis a patient seeks.
I really don't understand where you're coming from. It seems you don't want people to criticize psychiatry because it makes some people feel bad not having the validation of these disorders being a totally legit, agreed upon science?
I think that's taking the completely wrong angle, like I said I am diagnosed and I don't feel bad about it one bit despite all my opinions here.
Cancer is an extreme example here because being 1. Based on hard physical evidence and 2. having a huge liability for misdiagnosis, doctors/hospitals would be in huge trouble if they diagnosed you with cancer and gave you chemo when you did not have it. This serves as a check against pharmaceutical interests.
Mental diagnoses/treatment on the other hand is mostly done in independent offices, private practices, and in prisons/institutions on committed people, and it carries very little risk if misdiagnosed. With adhd its even worse, because its often a diagnosis a patient seeks.
I really don't understand where you're coming from. It seems you don't want people to criticize psychiatry because it makes some people feel bad not having the validation of these disorders being a totally legit, agreed upon science?
I think that's taking the completely wrong angle, like I said I am diagnosed and I don't feel bad about it one bit despite all my opinions here.