"Update: MPAA just asked the court to deny Google’s amicus brief. They argue that Google’s perspective is one-sides and that the company acts as a partisan advocate for Hotfile."
Incredible. This plays out like a bad soap opera, except one where all of our freedoms are at stake.
If Google's brief is one-sided, what does that make the MPAA's attack?
The MPAA is apparenly the plaintiff here, I'd expect it's okay for them to be biased! Google isn't immediately part of the case and is butting in on the assumption that they're helping out the court, not to make the whole case for either side.
Incredible. This plays out like a bad soap opera, except one where all of our freedoms are at stake.
If Google's brief is one-sided, what does that make the MPAA's attack?