I think you're missing the point. With a 6% inflation, a 6% raise means the employees are worth the same as before, not more.

It's worse. Many people could see their fractional tax burden increasing as their nominal wage rises and crosses higher tax bandings. Inflating is a slow theft, and the description of "financial oppression" is apt.

Tax brackets in the US are indexed to inflation. They weren't always, but that was changed in the 80's I think?

It doesn't look like the increase is quite 6% across the board, however: https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-provides-tax-inflation-adju...

You definitely don't know how progressive tax brackets work.

Depends on whether we're talking about real or nominal wages. Regardless, my main point is that most people must switch jobs to see the increase. Wages grew 6.6% for job switchers so it is keeping up with inflation.

IT and professional services was 10.5%+ but again only for job switchers.

https://www.valuepenguin.com/news/ADP-wage-growth-report

We're definitely talking about nominal.

wing-_-nuts said 'with inflation rising at 6%, will the company reconsider their 'standard' 2% raise?'

It wouldn't make any sense to say that if the 2% raise was real.

So, the economically rational thing for everyone to do is to engage in this gigantic game of musical chairs, if they care about the number at the bottom of their paystub? That's silly, and a great way to throw away a lot of specialized domain knowledge.

There's a lot of value in playing musical chairs. The market is pretty good at allocating human labor. Some companies get left without people in the seats and others, often the more innovative companies end up with more than they had before.

A labor market with high liquidity leaves most people better off.

The labor market can go fuck itself if it doesn't serve the people, IMO. People aren't just for creating "value." They have lives. If the economy doesn't work for people, it just plain doesn't work. Not everybody wants to change jobs all the time. Those people don't deserve pay cuts for providing the same "value" they provided a year ago.

Sure just let the most motivated ones leave!

> It's foolish to raise by 6% across the whole company when most employees are too lazy to interview elsewhere.

I mean, aren't people resigning in droves these days?