Douglas Englebart is the proof to me that even if you could go back in time, it isn't necessarily true that you could leverage your knowledge of future technology. Poor guy messed up the timeline so much that even his stock market knowledge was useless!

>Poor guy messed up the timeline so much that even his stock market knowledge was useless!

--

Without the time available to go down the Englebart rabbit hole can you distill the story down some and share?

Englebart famously demoed possible ways of interacting with computers that are now ubiquitous decades before they were actually popularized. I made a joke about him only having those ideas because he was a time traveler from the future, but tried to implement them too early. Then, after he already didn't make billions from his ideas, he couldn't use his future knowledge of investment because his demo was still big enough to change which companies got wealthy (explaining why he didn't make billions investing in the companies that actually invented those ideas in his timeline).

The explanation might make the joke sound rather cryptic but if it any consolation I did get it, and it did make me smile.

I also watch far too much Sci-Fi so my brain is wired to assume people are time traveller and such like :D

Watch the aforementioned Mother of all Demos and compare it to what you're watching it on.

That's a wonderful way of putting it

> even if you could go back in time, it isn't necessarily true that you could leverage your knowledge of future technology.

Relatedly:

"Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats." -- Howard H. Aiken

"No Douglas, I don't know where you can buy that. What the hell even is a Bitcoin?"

I feel like there's an untapped reserve of jokes along this line. XKCD, this, and that's it! There could be so much more!

Ah yes, I definitely intended a hat tip to Engelbart but I forgot to include it in the article. I reinvented it only semi-independently.

To be fair, he didn't invent it either. He was just the first to use one with a computer.

Looks like that makes two of us who forgot to include attribution...

You're in good company :)

Great write up. Question: why does the one keycap on the 'behold' photo look like it is so much less high? (on the other photo they seem identical)

Oh shit. I made another (full) keyboard the other day and I was missing four keycaps, and looking at the photo now I realized where I put them!

One of the keycaps is from a different row, so it has a different height on one side, but on the other side they're the same height.

Heh! You're welcome ;)

You definitely saved my keyboard there :P

The original version, used for stenography, was a kind of chorded typewriter:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stenotype

I'm sure I remember an Asimov story where a reporter is hiding one of these in his pocket and taking notes unobtrusively, hoping nobody will notice the small hand movements.

Just like Matt Damon in The Departed, texting on a flip phone in his pocket, betraying Martin Sheen while standing right next to him.

I used a nice IBM chord keyboard in the late 70s but can't find a photo. It had the space bar sticking out to the side for your thumb; the other keys didn't just have a divot on their tops, as with a typical keyboard today but also on the faces and corners to encourage you to press multiples. With some practice you could get pretty fast.

That sounds like the coveted DataHand keyboard: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DataHand

The machines court reporters use seem like they would be chorded keyboards from long before 1968.

I thought it would be cool if I could base a chorded typing system off an actual digital piano and use the MIDI interface to type, and design it such that most words would actually sound nice if the digital piano outputted sound at the same time. I just haven't put in the time to figure out a good efficient system.

Would be kind of neat if I could "hear" a blog post as I was typing it, and maybe eventually even learn to listen to text transcribed as music.

Part of what makes music so wonderful (and universal) is that it encodes information somewhat more ambiguously than written or spoken language. You could probably see comprehension and memory dividends from transitioning to a music-based communication system - especially considering that we're hardwired to process music even more so than we are to process language - but I dunno if I'd want to give up the aforementioned aspects of the human experience.

There was a commercial chord keyboard “word processor” in the late 70’s called Microwriter

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwriter

that is fun:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b9/Septambi...