That’s your interpretation of the article’s interpretation of the court’s interpretation I guess. Making all the foregoing my interpretation of your interpretation.

Having read the Tesla website myself and understood its claims, they are not false.

I believe the court was concerned that it was theoretically possible that some people might get confused.

Or to put it in a harsh (to Tesla) way, the court feared some consumers could be misled (I would add, misled only due to the consumer’s own failure to read and listen to the information offered by Tesla with several different opportunities in varied and timely settings).

So with this in mind, the court took action based on those fears.

Conclusions beyond that are not warranted.