Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I thought the IARC conclusion was that glyphosate was probably carcinogenic? This whole case was built on that, no?


The evidence IARC is relying on is extremely thin. I'm not commenting on the case, so much as making the observation that glyphosate can be fine (it most likely is) without the Roundup product itself being safe.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: