Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The problem is deeper, this idea of contracts enforced by computer code written by humans ( = full of bugs) is a dumb one.


Just because some smart contracts fail doesn't mean they all have to.


The problem is one of trust. Contracts that can either be formally verified, or by nature of the language they are written in are mathematically guaranteed to be free of certain bugs and behaviors can be 'TRUSTED'.

It's a very bad thing to not be able to trust that your money can't be trivially stolen.


Yeah. But which are which, and are you willing to put your money on that?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: